Prediction of Emily Bond vs Martine Bunschoten Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
E. Bond vs M. Bunschoten

Emily Bond

GBR

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

310

Best Rank

430

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Martine Bunschoten

NED

2

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

310

Best Rank

430

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Bond 2 - 1 Bunschoten

They have played 6 sets in total, with Emily Bond winning 4 and Martine Bunschoten winning 2. The last match between Emily Bond and Martine Bunschoten was at the ITF Midland, 30-01-1995, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Emily Bond getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Bond	2
Bunschoten	1

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(Q1) ITF Midland(01-30-95)

Stats

Emily Bond

Martine Bunschoten

(R3) ITF San Antonio(01-16-95)

Stats

Emily Bond

Martine Bunschoten

(R3) ITF Bergen(01-20-92)

Stats

Martine Bunschoten

Emily Bond

E. Bond vs M. Bunschoten H2H Profile

E. Bond	Stats	M. Bunschoten
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
47.19% (84-94)	Career Total W/L	45.16% (42-51)
2	Hard	0
0	Indoor	1
1	Titles	0
2	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

E. Bond vs M. Bunschoten Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Emily Bond has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Martine Bunschoten has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Emily Bond, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Martine Bunschoten has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Emily Bond has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martine Bunschoten has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Emily Bond has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Martine Bunschoten winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Emily Bond has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 7/4), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 15/30). Martine Bunschoten has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 33/36), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 5/10).
Player level: In the last year, Emily Bond has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Martine Bunschoten has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Emily Bond winning 2 times and Martine Bunschoten being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Emily Bond winning 4 and Martine Bunschoten winning 2.
The last match between Emily Bond and Martine Bunschoten was at the ITF Midland, 30-01-1995, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Emily Bond getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Emily Bond has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Martine Bunschoten has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Emily Bond has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martine Bunschoten has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Emily Bond has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martine Bunschoten has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Emily Bond vs Martine Bunschoten Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

E. Bond vs M. Bunschoten H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

E. Bond	Stats	M. Bunschoten
2	H2H Matches Won	1
4	Sets Won	2
27	Games Won	24
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
67% (2/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	33% (1/3)
100% (2/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/2)

Recent Performance Stats

E. Bond Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Edinburgh 25K - 28-10-1996
R4 Samantha SmithS. Smith	L	6-3 6-3	Stats
R3 Kirstin FreyeK. Freye	W	7-5 2-6 7-6	Stats
St-Raphael 10K - 07-10-1996
R4 Audrey PierrichA. Pierrich	W	7-6 2-2 RET	Stats
Maja MatevzicM. Matevzic	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
SF Susi Fortun LohrmannS. Fortun	L	3-6 6-3 7-6	Stats

View All

M. Bunschoten Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Wezel - 21-08-1995
R3 Audrey WilmartA. Wilmart	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
ITF Wahlscheid - 14-08-1995
R3 Unknown PlayerU. Player	L	6-3 6-0	Stats
ITF Horb - 31-07-1995
R3 Katrin KilschK. Kilsch	W	6-3 7-5	Stats
R4 Sylva NesvadbovaS. Nesvadbova	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
ITF Heerhugowaard - 24-07-1995
R3 Clarissa MartinessiC. Martinessi	L	7-6(3) 6-1	Stats

View All

E. Bond vs M. Bunschoten Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

E. Bond	Stats	M. Bunschoten
47.19% (84/94)	YTD Win/Loss	45.16% (42/51)
47.59% (188/207)	Sets Win/Loss	46.34% (95/110)
49.61% (1763/1791)	Games Win/Loss	48.82% (892/935)
49.41% (42/43)	Hard Win/Loss	33.33% (5/10)
33.33% (15/30)	Clay Win/Loss	47.83% (33/36)
54.55% (18/15)	Indoor Hard W/L	44.44% (4/5)
63.64% (7/4)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
529.07	Average Opponent Rank	576.34
45.05% (50/61)	Challenger W/L	46.43% (39/45)
50.00% (2/2)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
46% (81/175)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	46% (42/92)
50% (6/12)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (8/15)
44% (19/43)	Deciding Set Win %	45% (9/20)
86% (87/75)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (45/39)
14% (87/12)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (45/6)
9% (90/8)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	6% (48/3)